In defense of thoughts
April 27, 2007 By: almostgotit Category: business, employment, goals, humor, online quizzes, success, thought, unemployable, writers, writingFor days now, I’ve been reflecting on something that appeared in one of Penelope Trunk’s recent columns.
It seems that Trunk spoke to success coach Jim Fannin, who told her “that research has shown that wildly successful people have 1,000 fewer thoughts a day than others, which allows the successful people to have exceptional focus on their goals.”
Well now. That certainly provides some real food for… well, something in which I’ve been overindulging, apparently. But I can’t help myself. You see: I really LIKE having thoughts.
I was relieved to find out I’m not the only career-minded person who has this strange proclivity. Maureen Rogers wrote, in her own marvelous comment at the end of Trunk’s column:
I’m with AlmostGotIt. I LIKE having thoughts, too. After thinking about it, I’ve come to the realization that those of us who are introspective; who really, truly, like to think about things; who are highly analytical are probably just not all that cut out to be risk-taking entrepreneurs. To succeed in an entrepreneurial endeavor, you need to have supreme conviction – and thinkers tend to spend perhaps too much time evaluating risk, playing “what-if”, etc.. A better job for us: chief of staff, advisor to the throne, internal consultant….
“Advisor to the throne.” I definitely pick that one. (You know: for now, I mean.)
But perhaps the problem here is that I don’t have the right qualifications to have thoughts. This possibility has been brought up before.
At The Institution Which Shall Not Be Named (to pick an example at wild random) there is only a very small allotment allowed for thinkers, and these slots are all taken by highly-trained Thinkologists. Many of those who have gone through the entire formation process of Thinkology are surprisingly intelligent, diversity-promoting, even iconoclastic thinkers. However, their thoughts still must be chosen from the approved intelligent,-diversity-promoting,-even-iconoclastic LIST.
Which, needless to say, is entirely unavailable to inflammatory non-thinkologists such as myself.
I decided that Jim Fannin might be onto something.
So I visited his website. I was glad to find that he has an online quiz, which of course I took immediately to see if I “[Don’t] Think Like A Champion.” Here is what I found out:
The results indicate your S.C.O.R.E. Level is dangerously low. You are not in the game. If this score persists either change your goal or approach it in a completely different way. You are on the wrong path.
Wow, this is bad.
Fortunately, Fannin has a number of products which could help put me back IN the game. Unfortunately, unlike many of his other clients, I don’t have a professional baseballer’s salary to pay for any of them.
But perhaps I can offer him some small repayment-in-kind, at least. Bob Sutton, a professor at the prestigious Harvard Business School, has developed another little online quiz which, I humbly submit, may be just the thing.
——-
Related Posts:
In defense of thoughts (part 1)
To have as many thoughts as possible (part 2)
The size of thoughts (part 3)



April 27th, 2007 at 3:49 pm
Totally true. Too many thoughts and perhaps not enough action. A good business leader will filter out the superfluous chaff and focus on what is truly important for success. It may not even be the best course of action, but it is action. Does it mean this person is particularly smart? No. But, this person would also be skilled at surrounding themselves with smart people to help make a chosen course of action successful.
April 28th, 2007 at 1:28 am
Dear Almost – This is too funny! Following your lead, I, too, took the Fannin Zone Coach quiz. While not scoring dangerously low, I did score low. Unfortunately – despite unblocking pop-ups and following the instructions for activating controls – I just could not get my sub-scores on Self-discipline, Concentration, Optimism, Relaxation and Enjoyment to appear. In any case, my problem with the quiz was the answers. Not one of them was something that I actually agreed with. If it had been offered, I always would have said something else – or none of the above. Sometimes it’s so darned hard to be a thinker, isn’t it?
April 28th, 2007 at 6:27 pm
No one seems to be checking my “humble suggestion” at the end of the post. And I am just FAR too polite to point out such a crass joke any more directly…
Hi Yep! You have a very valid point about the importance of taking action. I’ve been to those meetings, too, where people can discuss a minor thing to death (and then go back to their offices and EMAIL back and forth about it even more), while nothing, at all, ever gets done. Neither about that minor thing, nor about all the more important things it distracted everyone from. But the idea of banishing thought altogether seemed just a bit extreme! I like your “voice,” Yep, and hope you’ll share it with us again!
Hi again, Maureen! Thanks so much for commenting! I’ve been enjoying both of your blogs, and your blogroll has some good things on it, too.
October 9th, 2008 at 10:34 am
[...] ——– Related posts: Chapter two-ing In defense of thoughts [...]